BGH: Termination of an injunction agreement due to abuse of rights

Abusive conduct in connection with a warning may constitute good cause for the termination of a cease-and-desist agreement based on the warning. In the case of a cease-and-desist agreement concluded on the basis of an abusive warning, the assertion of contractual penalties for breaches committed by the debtor prior to the termination of the agreement is precluded by the objection of abuse of rights pursuant to Section 242 BGB(BGH, judgment of February 14, 2019, case reference: I ZR 6/17).

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Contact person

Picture of Dennis Tölle

Dennis Tölle

Specialist Attorney for Copyright and Media Law; Specialist Attorney for Intellectual Property Law

Free newsletter

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Search

Request