Advertising claim “significantly better bioavailability” misleading

The advertising claim that a medicinal product has a “significantly better bioavailability” than a competitor’s product, which is emphasized in an eye-catching manner and with reference to a study, is understood by the trade to mean that the advertised property of the product has a nutritionally relevant benefit when consumed by the consumer, which is why the trade is misled if the advertised superiority of the product’s bioavailability is statistically significant, but a nutritionally relevant benefit is not proven by the study referred to(OLG Hamburg, judgment v. May 9, 2019, Ref.: 3 U 203/17).

Are you a law firm outside Germany? We act as German and European counsel for foreign firms in trade mark, copyright and unfair competition matters, and the client relationship stays on your side. How we work with foreign law firms.

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Contact person

Picture of Dennis Tölle

Dennis Tölle

Specialist Attorney for Copyright and Media Law; Specialist Attorney for Intellectual Property Law

Free newsletter

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Search

Request