Inpatient treatment is expected at a “clinic”

In a recent decision, the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg has continued the long-standing case law of various courts on the term “clinic”. The relevant public assumes that “clinic” is used synonymously with a hospital department or a hospital. The essential characteristic is therefore that the self-designated clinic also has material and personnel resources for inpatient treatment and care. This also applies in the case of a “voice clinic.” It could not be inferred from the word element “Stimm-” that this could only be about treatments that would regularly avoid inpatient treatment. The term is therefore misleading pursuant to Sections 3, 5 (1) UWG (Higher Regional Court of Hamburg, decision of September 2, 2020, case no.: 3 U 205/19).

Are you a law firm outside Germany? We act as German and European counsel for foreign firms in trade mark, copyright and unfair competition matters, and the client relationship stays on your side. How we work with foreign law firms.

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Contact person

Picture of Dennis Tölle

Dennis Tölle

Specialist Attorney for Copyright and Media Law; Specialist Attorney for Intellectual Property Law

Free newsletter

Kostenloser Newsletter

Aktuelle Urteile, Praxistipps und neue Folgen aus Marken-, Urheber-, Medien- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Kompakt per E-Mail.

Double-Opt-in. Abmeldung jederzeit über den Link in jeder E-Mail.

Search

Request