Suspicious activity reporting: high requirements for proper confrontation
Suspicious activity reporting: Only permissible in the case of prior confrontation and sufficient supporting evidence. We go into the legal requirements.
Suspicious activity reporting: Only permissible in the case of prior confrontation and sufficient supporting evidence. We go into the legal requirements.
Incorrect company data on the internet? Find out how courts handle incorrect statements to protect corporate privacy rights.
In preliminary injunction proceedings, the Higher Regional Court of Dresden ruled that the association “One Percent” could be blocked as a “hate organization” on the Facebook and Instagram platforms.

The landlord of the Tegernseer Bräustüble had taken legal action before the Munich Regional Court because Google had displayed waiting times of up to 90 minutes even though there were empty tables in the restaurant.
On the admissibility of verbal and visual reporting on persons in criminal proceedings.
Temporary blocking of a social media account does not justify a claim for compensation and does not violate the GDPR
There are several matters in dispute if several infringements of rights realized in a specific form of infringement are each attacked separately by way of so-called cumulative accumulation of claims.
ARD does not have to broadcast the NPD’s European election advertisement if it violates the criminal offense of incitement to hatred.

The participation of a celebrity in a campaign for bicycle helmets does not justify the publication of a photo of the celebrity’s child.
Right to republication of positive user reviews on doctor review portal